Analytics of Morality and Legal Requirements
User Rating: 0 / 5
- Details
- Hits: 6529
Analytics of Morality and Legal Requirements
Morality and legality are at times incomparable and many times conflict and current researchers have been trying to distinguish and explain the terms in their different forms. Legal actions are no all-time beneficial to everyone, as by the end of such actions or decisions some tend to gain while others lose or get hurt (Bucolo, Cohn, Rebellon, & Van, 2010). The legal requirements subject everyone to obey the law, laws that often represent moral standards of a society at their minimum (Hosmer, 2011). Not all legal situations recognize the rights of everyone as some will feel their rights are diminished while at the same time others feel that their rights are recognized. Legality and morality can be said to be all in the reason and judgment.
People have different reasoning about morality in the society as others feel that as long as their actions are legally acceptable, it does not matter whether it is moral or not (Bucolo, Cohn, Rebellon, & Van, 2010). It will be logical for an organisation to balance between what is legal and moral to ensure that there is fairness to every person within for the better performance of the firm. The minimal standards within the legal requirements should capture the worth, nature and understanding of different individuals within a group. However, the legal requirements can miss out some diversity that to others may be of advantage while to the rest it may be hurting (Hosmer, 2011). The relation between organizations goes beyond the legal requirements and extends to common reason and understanding of the different personalities that exists. This, in essence, will help deal with the complex moral problems within organisations.
Legal reasoning within organizations must not violate the morals of other persons and rule-breaking behaviors of individuals must be identified (Bucolo, Cohn, Rebellon, & Van, 2010). Reasonably, a person who keeps to the law cannot be, and such person cannot be faulted. Firms strive to optimize their returns and benefits to the society, and as long as they are within the legal requirements, anything that prevents them from that would be considered economically unethical (Hosmer, 2011). For this reason, therefore, there must be a link between action and judgment in such a situation to ensure that fairness is enhanced (Bock, Brooks, & Narvaez, 2013). Passing a new law to effect change is usually a process and at a point where such need come up in an organisation and, therefore, there must be considerations put in place over law that will ensure people within the organisation do not feel neglected or undermined.
Even though the law may not to an extent consider the worth of other persons in the sense of morality aspects, people within a society must not wait for provisions within the law that subject them to do so. There must be a clear distinction between legality and morality from the sense of reason and in the conduct of people to ensure that conditions are achieved conducive and accommodating different people (Bock, Brooks, & Narvaez, 2013). From the sense of moral and sound reason, it is almost impossible to support the assumption of some people that as long as what they are doing is legal, all other factors are constant. People must engage sound moral judgment that in turn takes to influence their actions. The sensitivity of the critical aspects of a situation must be visualized and a proper sound judgment put in place that will ensure everyone within a society or an organisation is motivated (Bock, Brooks, & Narvaez, 2013). Moral actions and behaviors are then implemented that take into account diversity of the people involved.