Robert Moses: Biography
- Details
- Hits: 7841
The following essay is a sample paper for an essay on Robert Moses: Biography. It should not be used as a ready paper for your assignment as it is already in our website. In case you want an original paper on the same topic please order for the essay at our site and our able writers will work on it from the scratch.
Robert Moses: Biography
Robert Moses was born on December 18, 1888 and is attributed as a master builder of the mid 20th century in New York, and a shaper of the modern city, he is therefore sometimes referred to as the Baron Haussmann of the second empire Paris. He is one of the figures that shaped the area of public administration and seen as a figure in history of the urban planning in the United States. Particularly, he changed shorelines, tunnels and roads; built bridges and transformed his neighborhoods in a complete way. His decisions were of high quality and he is one of those persons who created a kind of modern suburbs of the long island and as well influenced some kind of generation for the architects, engineers and the urban planners. One of the influences in his public administration work is when he was at the front line in the construction of ten gigantic pools, which were placed under the WPA program during the great depression.
Moses is also attributed to having persuaded Governor Smith as well as the government of New York City in allowing him to hold a state and the city government jobs at the same time and what comes out of this is that he was a person who was a master of many areas. He was also the head of many public authorities, and while at the helm especially as the chair, he was flexible enough to associate with private enterprises along with tax-exempt debt capacity, which was associated with the policies and agencies of the government. He was at the heart of building of Triborough Bridge, which has been named as Robert F. Kennedy Memorial Bridge, which in essence influenced the governors and the mayors. In addition, he was involved in others like Brooklyn Battery Bridge, Post war city planning, and Brooklyn dodgers. On another light note, Moses is a known drive and has a strong drive culture he holds for himself.
Robert Moses and his Administrative Decisions
For the best description, Robert Moses was a power broker who could gamble his ways simply to make sure that he gets what he wants. For a better description, Caro (1974) notes that he was a kind of giant who was straddling the give boroughs of the New York city as well as its suburbs. He was part of the roiling Hell Gate as well as the other on the Atlantic Ocean, that is, the beachfront of Brooklyn, and the Long Island. The description as a giant therefore refers to somebody who believed in his own idea in any kind of administrative decision that he took, and the influence as a person that he was capable of turning round something to become fruitful. He had giant twists around all his direction and this meant that all the people that worked with him had to make sure that they tow the line; otherwise, they would miss a point when he is up to something for the whole city and its suburbs.
As it is of a giant who envisions what is to come to it, or it has some instincts, this great man made some decisions knowing very well that their popularity would come to be enjoyed by the future generations. As well, the giant may not think in human terms, and this is the best description of this man whose decisions could not have been popular when he was implementing them. However, they were later appreciated and this meant that he may not have been a consultative person to do what is right, but took his own influences to build up something. To him, anything around him meant nothing, but what was inside him was most vital to an extent that he relied purely on what he thought was right to make something work. Caro (1974) describes him as a perfect kind of person who has brilliant inventions and his legacy in a kind of form that helped build empires and other forms of necessary structures.
In absolute term, he retains the title master builder up to the present day, and he had absolute control of what he thought was the best for him. It is hard to substitute this great man to reduce him to something else, and this is not by counting his shortfalls persons in his quest to enter politics. Even though, significant potion of people may like to describe him as a horrible power broker, but the truth stands that he was horribly true to be a power broker. He meant what he said, and before he thought of something for implementation, it was emanating deep from him. He had a tactic of persuasion even though this kind of persuasion was coercive. What remains is that his persuasion helped turn around most of the things that could not have been the case had he to keep quite on what he thought was right. Schwartz (1993) noted that, he was one of the early reformers when it came to revolving the city, which we could say that he thought about it very much. He adds that he can be pictured as a person who was an idealist reformer but also a political manipulator.
For him to become what he was, he had to do what it pertained, and that is to climb some ladder even when he did not know where they would have taken him. He was a gambler in life especially that of politics, and in doing so, he manipulated his way up, and eventually, he gained some form of domination. The problem with him is that his operations were that of a single-minded genius who perhaps was very individualistic or thought that he was the only person who was capable of turning something round. Overall, his tricks worked, as we review him today, we can comfortably say that he was idealistic and his gambling ideas helped in having the kind of New York City that we have today. His ideas are therefore exception and it is unlikely that he can be compared to his successors up to the present day, not in what they have done but on basis of creativity.
The Quality of My Life
True, we had a revolutionary mind in Robert Moses and his death later in the 20th century was a great loss. However, he only set precedence, and if we were to review what we have today, it could be said that he had set a pace and a background to what should be extended. However, his life revolved politics and constructions, and if he has a history, then, most of his mention is in the field of construction and politics. That is not to say that he did not influence on other sectors of management as he helped set some example, but there are people in other sectors who have made their life quality by the little they do on a daily basis. In addition, that includes my life, which has been created and made quality as per the description of a number of people because of making strong and own decisions. I hereby note that my success is to be attributed to my own ladder, and even though young, there is hope that at the end, there are people who are going to emulate my own life.
I could say that right from the start of my life, I had a great dad, and this is because at least he allowed me to be close to him when tender in most of his undertaking. Even though, I did not copy exactly what he was doing, what I turned myself to be is to use some bits of his skills in inventing another sector altogether. This became a trend, and up to the current life, I can say that I garner what life presents and then use some bits of what I get to come up with my own way of climbing up. My role model is myself, and I trust my mind that I can gamble my way. Basically, I am a gambler, a risk taker and go getter, and in the end, I tend to conflict with a number of people. Overall, what I have can be copied or emulated by many people who would wish to turn their life to become as of quality as the one I lead.
References
Caro, R. (1974). The power broker: Robert Moses and the fall of New York. New York: Vintage Books.
Schwartz, J. (1993). The New York approach: Robert Moses, urban liberals, and development of the inner city. New York: Ohio State University Press.